More on President Obama’s Regulatory CZAR Cass Sunstien

387.) Cass Sunstein is apparently unable to understand the concept of the consitution. You see the consitution is a set of laws that are set in stone to limit the powers of government. It does not grant the government power it limits its power.  Either he does not understand the concept of the consitution or he cannot read. That is made clear by his attacks on the second Ammendment.
“Almost all gun control legislation is constitutionally fine. And if the Court is right,then fundamentalism does not justify the view that the Second Amendment protects anindividual right to bear arms. ” see What did I tell you. Almost all gun control legislation is constitutionally fine. However lets take a look at second ammendment then shall we? “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.”  SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED that means that the government cannot hamper my right to own a fire arm, thats it. Some will say that the preamble of the ammendment means that it only applies to militia’s, however this is not true.  A well regulated militia is just one of the reasons for the second ammendment, it was put in there as an example, this was a common practice in the 18th century and the courts have shown many times that the preamble does not limit or change the meaning of the law.  Some will say that the punctuation change the meaning of the law, that is not true either as the science of linguistics had not yet been invented. Some will point to the Well regulated as to meaning that the government has to be involved, but in the time the law was writen the word regulated ment disciplined or trained, meaning basically they were capable of putting lead on target.  So no, Cass Sunstein gun control is not constitutionally fine.

388.) Cass Sunstein has continueally spoken out against our freedom of speech believing that freedoms are something the government can regulate. He said, “A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government.”  Whats odd about this is that it closely mirrors what President Obama said at an earlier commencement speech how new media’s are a distraction and not in the best interest of the country.  America is a nation of choices that’s why people come here, that is why they leave the communist “paradise” of Cuba on inner tubes and old tires to make it to our shores. So why on earth should we limit the choices of communication? What is so bad about people communicating, could it be that an informed populous are capable of understanding the theft that is currently taking place in Washington? Could it be that communication is dangerous to the progressive agenda? I know clearly I do not, and cannot under stand the complex workings of the socialist system, I mean it is working so well for Europe right now, I mean Greece looks like the ideal spot to go for a family vacation.  What makes all of this worse is that Cass Sunstein attempts to make it sound like government regulation is nothing to be worried about, “A legislative effort to regulate broadcasting in the interest of democratic principles should not be seen as an abridgment of the free speech guarantee.” Legislative effort to regulate broadcasting, somehow doesn’t impede my freedom of speech.  I believe a simple trip to that old and worn out “charter of negative liberties” (quote barack obama), The Consitution can prove that infact legislative effort to regulate broadcasting is infact an abridgment of my first amendment rights. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” So lets take a look here, Congress shall make no law the prohibits or abridges the freedom of speech or freedom of the press. So in fact legislative acts to regulate broadcasting does impede my freedom of speech.  IT would appear as though Cass Sunstein has either never read the Constitution or he simply does not care about the law of the land. The Consitution was set down by our founding fathers as a set of iron clad rules that would insure that the government never got out of control, it is not a living document to be tweaked or nudged in any direction you please, unforutnatly Mr. Sunstein has yet to, and probably never will learn this.


  1. 387)  Too many people argue that the 2nd Amendment was written for the National Guard.  This is untrue.  The National Guard is not militia, it is military.  There IS a difference.  Militia is private citizens, National Guard is a state run entity.  The key words in the 2nd Amendment are “the people.”  That’s all that matters.388)  It’s all about a power grab, and to silence any and all opposition.  We’re living in  dangerous times.

  2. Aron said:

    It cannot have effect in actual fact, that is exactly what I think. check LINK 2. Gosh, there is a great deal of useful information above! 2 9 link. Very worthwhile piece of writing, thank you for your article. site 3 web. It cannot succeed as a matter of fact, that’s what I suppose.

Let the discussion begin

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: