President Obama gave a speech to the middle east on May 19, 2011 the fallowing points come from that speech.
553.) President Obama has felt the need to slap around every long term ally the United States has ever had, in favor of bending over to the radical powers of the world. He believes in adopting the methodes of William Chamberland, just give the evil men of the world what they won’t, and take them at their word that they will stop the violence. The appeasement mentality. President Obama most recent victim is Israel. President Obama said, “The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states, with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan and Egypt, and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine. The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach their potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state.” Contiguous means actually being in contact, touching along a boundry at a point, touching or connected through an unbroken sequence. What does a contiguous Palestinian State mean for Israel? The Palestinians want to get the Golan Heights, Gaza Strip, and the West Bank and form on contiguous nation. The Gaza Strip and the West Bank do not touch each other. For them to be a contiguous state, Israel would have to be cut in half. Now I know the President is only calling for a return to the pre-1967 boarders, but why should Israel think that that will be the end of the land lose? What has President Barack Obama done to make them feel that they will have an ally in their corner? This very speech undermines any such security. President Barack H. Obama has basically come out and told Israel to give up the land it gained as a consequence of the six day war. A war that the United Arab Republic, Syria, and Jordan brought upon themselves. These nations made repeated threats against Israel, and stated their intent to not only attack, but to destroy the nation of Israel. They mobilized their forces and prepared for an attack on Israel. Out of fear, Israel mobilized its forces 80% of which were reserved civilians. Rather than wait for an attack Israel made the first move. The results were clear, Israel won. Part of the peace settlement was the land that President Barack Obama is demanding that Israel give back. wants to basically force Israel to give up land, to a group that wants to wipe them off the face of the earth. This would be like the U.N. forcing us to give Texas, California, New Mexico, Utah, and Nevada back to Mexico. This would be like them forcing us to give Florida back to Spain, this would be like forcing us to the original 13 colonies back to the United Kingdom. All just to appease a group of radicals. How well did that work for Chamberlin in World War II? Did his appeasing Hitler end the war, did it bring peace to the world, did it save the lives of millions? The answer is no, it served only to embolden the radical seeking a new world order. What makes the President think that appeasement will end any differently this time than it has in the past?
554.) I hit the issue of the contiguous Palistinian state pretty hard. President Obama’s speech has served to undermine the history of the United States relationship with Israel, and to further demonstraight President Obama’s arrogance. President George W. Bush wrote a letter to the then Prime Minister of Israel Ariel Sharon, in that letter he said, “As part of a final peace settlement, Israel must have secure and recognized borders, which should emerge from negotiations between the parties in accordance with UNSC Resolutions 242 and 338. In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli populations centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949, and all previous efforts to negotiate a two-state solution have reached the same conclusion.” So in a mere three years, we have gone from sted fast allies, to throwing them to the lions. What does that do to our creditablity in the world? Why would anyone believe a word we say, when at the first politicaly convient opprotunity we will cast you out like a lepper. Notice the last couple of sentences in that quote, the part where it says that it is unrealistic to expect Israel to shrink back to the 1967 boarders, and all pervious negotiations have come to that same conclusion. What makes President Obama think that this time around it will be different? What does is on the table now that wasn’t before? Obviously it is because we have a leader who holds no loyality to friends, a leader who thinks that his words could part the red sea. The negotiations will work this time because the President of the United States truely believes that if he talks enough the wind can make the mountain bow to it. His arrogance is mind boggling. Do things need to change to make success, yes, but the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again. They have tried to negotiate a return to the pre-67 boarders for years now, and it has never worked, and just because we have a talkative play boy President the response will still be the same.
In other news President Obama went to Ireland
555.) President Barack Obama went to Ireland, our country is in a debt crisis, we don’t have any money. He attacked the CEO’s of the automakers for flying on private jets to Washington DC to ask the tax payers for more money. I think he should start applying the same thought process to his own actions. Not only did he waste tax payer dollars by flying to Ireland, he went there to promise American support (aka money) to Ireland to help in their economic recovery. We all know that he wants to raise our taxes, which equats to him taking money from our pockets, I fail to see how this is any different than the Automanufactures incident.
556.) As President Barack Obama serves two crucial roles. The first is Cheif Executive, he is the countries sheirf, the man who is in charge of ensuring that laws of the land are enforced, and that our boarders are defended. The second is Head of State. He is the man who we sent to Washington to represent us to the world. He is the man who we turn to in times of hardship and turmoil for reassurance, for hope, he is the man who is supposed to embody our nations ideals. While on his “crucial” trip to Ireland President Obama could not resist the opprotunity to make our nation look like a nation of babbling baboons. While giving a speech, President Obama could not resist the urge to through in a poorly executed Irish accent. What in the world goes through this man’s head before he opens his mouth. Things like that are funny amongst friends, but when you are on a international stage representing over 300 million people, it is entirely inappropriate. Not only is it an excellent example of President Obama’s immaturity, it is just plane rude. These people where kind enough to allow him to speak, and he repays their hospitality by mocking them? His excuse, he is part Irish. That makes it okay then, I am part Cherrokee does that mean its okay for me to walk around in a loincloth with a feather tied in my hair, talking like someone out of a Clint Eastwood movie? No its rude, its mocking someone’s culture. It is time that President Obama wakes up and realizes that he isn’t a rock star on tour, he is the President of the United States, and that offices deserves more respect than what he is willing to show it.
557.) President Obama was given a gift on his vital trip to Ireland. The gift in question is a hurling stick, it is used in the sport of hurling which is like a combination of soccer, lacross, and football. Never wanting to waste an opprotunity to demonstraight his true opinions of the government, President Obama said, “If Congress doesn’t behave, I’m going to give them a little paddle, a little hurl” Oh are yeah now, going to beat around congress untill they come around to your way of thinking? That is not how the system works. Congress is supposed to be an independent entity of the White House. The President is supposed to serve as a check on the legislature, the legislature a check on the power of the President. They aren’t supposed to behave, as you put it. The process was designed to be slow and time consuming. It was supposed to be incredibly hard to get anything through the legislative process, this way only good legislation that met the desires of the people was past. It was intended to act as a way to preserve our God given rights (yeah I said the G word). This President just makes my mind race. He doesn’t understand it, he doesn’t get it. He had two years, two full years, to get whatever he wanted passed, because his progressive palls were able to turn congress into a docile lap dog. They abused their power, insulted the rulers of this nation, and had to learn the hard way that what President Obama said about elections having consequences is true. In all actuallity elections are consequences, when individuals grow corrupt, fail to respect the fact that they work for the people of the district, that government serves the People, we through them out of office in favor of someone who will respect the duty we charge them with. The election did have a consequence though, he no longer can have whatever he wants, now he has to compromise and actually take part in a political process. Like any spoiled child who is met with the word NO for the first time President Obama naturally acts as if it is not his fault, it is congress that is not behaving. He has had is fun, helping out his union supporters, sending billions to political allies in “stimulus” funds, now his bosses are putting their foot down, and he doesn’t seem to like that. So he makes threats to a branch that he sees as lesser, subserviant, but is in all actuality is his equal.
Onto unrelated news.
558.) Remember when Egypt’s government was overthrown, President Obama praised it as a populus uprising. He through his support behind allowing the group that help stimulate the uprising, the Muslim Brotherhood, being able to participate in the elections. What is interesting about his support for the Muslim Brotherhood is that they are a terrorist organization. Now the progressives will cry foul and propbably call me racist, ignorant, and many other nasty names, but an interesting peice of evidence has arisen that helps to prove my point. Osama Bin Laden, the man responsible for the 911 attacks, the bombing of the USS Cole, the destruction of several US Embassies, and the first attacks on the world trade center, was radicalized as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now the President of the United States is supporting them. That would be like the President of Russia green lighting the KKK to participate in the next Presidential election.
559.) President Obama has come out to support his terrorist appeasment plan that he announced on May 19, he said, “What I did on Thursday was to say publicly what has long been acknowledged privately. I have done so because we cannot afford to wait another decade, or another two decades, or another three decades, to achieve peace”. This is nothing more than a lie to cover his political rear. President Bush’s letter, referenced in point 554, disproves this. If the last two years is a long time, then yes, but that is not the reality of the world, just the progressive mindset. Lets see the view point both publically and privately acknowledged by the previous administration “In light of new realities on the ground, including already existing major Israeli populations centers, it is unrealistic to expect that the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949, and all previous efforts to negotiate a two-state solution have reached the same conclusion.” That doesn’t sound like a President telling a sovergin nation to give up land it aquired fair and square thanks to the aggression of their neighbores.