I can’t believe that I am saying this, but the seed of the devil has been planted within the heart of the Republican Party. A conservative congressman has decided that to prevent shootings like the one at Sandy Hook and the movie theater in Auroa there must be a ban of the freedom of speech. According to this congressman it is our First Ammendment rights that have created the culture of violence that has allowed for madness that we have seen over the last couple of years. The violent video games, tv shows, and movie that all promote mass shootings and torture have brainwashed countless young people into believing that murder is okay. So this congress man has proposed that we not ban free speech, but rather we just control it. He wants to ban certian types of video games, such as:
Any game with a gun,
Any first person prospective game
Any multi-player game aimed at attacking other players
Any game where the player tries to kill or attack computer generated characters
He is also pushing for a ban on certian types of movies:
Horror Movies showing the mutilation of victims
Action movies using guns to shoot people
Slap Stick commedy
Any cartoon where a character has a gun,
Any cartoon where a character attacks another character
Any movie where the character attacks another character
The list goes on and on I am afraid, basically he wants to make it all but impossible to make a tv show, movie, or video game in this country. He has even targeted the news media. According to him, they are one of the primary causes of violence in this country. They constantly air the face and names of mad men who go on shooting sprees and murder innocent lives. This gives the mentally ill, or those who feel as though the world has ignored them, a way to express themselves, and make their vengance known. So this congressman has decided that we need to create a government agency tasked with managing the news media, its jobs include, but are not limited too:
Setting a cap on the number of reporters allowed in the country
Establishing standardized news programing times
Monitering and restricting activity on cable news programs
Establishing standard times where violent crimes are allowed to be covered
Establishing a standard timelimit for news networks to be allowed to discuss the stories they air
Establishing national criteria for becoming a reporter, or news anchor
Establishing a national criteria for what is allowed to be published in print media
Finger printing, and conducting background checks of all news media employees,
Creating a database and montier all of the activities of all news media employees
The insanity must not be allowed to happen, our First Ammendment rights are going to be trampled by this radical response to the recent tragedies in our country.
THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY HAPPENING, their is no vast right wing conspiracy theory trying to strip us of our first ammendment rights. I made this up. I wrote this to show you the danger in allowing the federal government to use a tragedy to create a precedent where it is acceptable for them to steal our rights, in the name of the greater good. Thankfully the scenerio I spelled out above is not actually happening, but radicals within the Democrat party are moving to do something just as damaging, just as radical, in response to the recent shootings within this nation.
As we are all aware, progressives hate to ever let a tragedy go to waste. They like to exploit hardship and sorrow to push radical agenda items. Well of course they have decided that the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementry School is a perfect tragedy to exploit to set a president for stealing our God given rights, all in the name of the greater good.
Diane Feinstien, a hard core progressive, is dead set and determined to end private gun ownership in this country. She has pushed congress to pass her radcial “Assualt Weapons Ban”. Her bill would ban ownership of all most all semi-automatic firearms, all handguns, most types of shotguns, requires all fire-arms to be registared, and treats gun owners like common criminals. Yes Ms. Feinstien wants all those vile monsters who dare exercise their God given rights to be treated like the demons they are. She wants all law abiding individuals who are exercising their God given rights to be finger printed and photographed.
Now in a previous post I highlighted the futility of the efforts being proposed by Ms. Feinstien. Gun Control does not have a record of lowering crime. Time and time again gun control efforts are passed by radical progressives, and time and time again crime rates go up after they go into effect. This is nothing more than an attempt by the radical leftests to set a precedent of stealing our rights in the name of the greater good. They want to condition us to assume that the government is allowed to take our rights from us. They want us to see the government as all powerful, as a body there to protect us simple minded country folks. If you think that they will stop here, stop with just making us give up the majority of our fire arms and registaring what they don’t steal from us, you are saddly mistaken. There is a reason for creating a gun owner registery, and it isn’t for monitering crime rates.
The purpose of this registary is so that they have a tool to complete their ultimate goal of disarming the American People. Let us look to history for guidence. As I have said countless times, gun control does not work. Banning guns, villainizing gun owners, does not stop criminals from being criminals. All it does is make us law abiding citizens easy targets. But progressives don’t opperate on facts and logic, they work off of emotions and fear. They ignore facts, and go off what feels rights. I feel that guns are scary, so we must ban them. So lets just say that Ms. Fienstien radical bill becomes law, (not to hard to imagine, the only hurdel is the House, and President Obama will just paint devil horns and hittler mustauches on GOP members until they cave). The government will come in and steal most of the guns owned by law abiding citizens. Criminals continue to smuggle guns a crossed our open boarder with Mexico, or keep guns hidden from the ATF. They are now able to feed much more easily on the un-armed law abiding masses. Crime rates and Murder Rates shot up through the roof. The progressives will now say, clearly all of these murders and crimes are being commited by law abiding citizens with bolt action rifles. So using the registry that they created when they passed the unconsitutional gun ban, they can easily round up the few remaining fire arms from the hands of private citizens. Think I am crazy? Well they did just that in the United Kingdom of Great Britian. Problem is even after they stole the guns from their citizens, crime rates still went up.
So now lets think for a little bit. They ban guns, and as we all know that plan goes down in flames, resulting in higher crime rates than before. What then will they take from us to prevent violent crimes? Will they go to a plan like the one I highlighted above? What will we do to stop them? What if they decided that the right to vote has become to dangerous, we might elect a radical who will abuse us. What is to stop them? We would have no way to fight back, now way to protect our rights. They took the one final check we have on our government, the fact that we are an armed people.
Here is a thought that I had on the subject, Moore, Feinstein, President Obama, Hollywood nut jobs… I mean actors, are all against the private ownership of firearms. Why would they need a gun to protect themselves they have an armed gaurd. So If Ms. Feinstein is so dead set and determined to steal our right to defend ourselves, then I would like to add an ammendment to her bill. If the private citizens of this nation are not allowed to possess fire arms, then here is what I want to see happen:
Disarm every police officer in the nation: they don’t need guns, the criminals couldn’t possibly have
any guns, sense guns are illegal. And the police having firearms, is only an opprotunity for criminals to
steal one to use against the people of this country.
Disarm every federal agent in the nation: Same reason as the police, the EPA, and the Department of
Agriculture don’t need armed agents
Ban all private security firms: There is no reason to have vigilanties taking the law into their own
hands, just to protect private property and the lives of Hollywood actors. There is no more crime sense
there are no more guns, so these brutes are no longer needed and should be banned.
Disband the Secret Service: The elected officals of this country will no longer need protecting sense
criminals will have no way to kill them, now that guns are illegal.
If we the private citizens, and true rulers of this land, are not allowed to defend ourselves, then those who stripped us of that right have no need nor right to be able to defend themselves. Why would we need armed police officers, or private security, or a secret service if criminals can’t kill people anymore sense they couldn’t possibly have a gun to do it. They are just costly expenses that this country just can’t afford. We can cut the deficit and wipe out crime all at once.
Of course the power hungry progressives will call this a radical plan, say I am crazy, say that I am evil, call me stupid, racists, or any other assortment of names. I expect that, and I know that it is coming. They don’t like it when people reveal their schemes to the world. Nor do they like it when you use facts to debate an issue rather than feelings. We have to stand up for our rights now, or we will lose them. This is not about whether or not we should be allowed to have guns, that issue was decided when the second ammendment was ratified. This issue is about whether or not the government should be able to steal our rights when it is convient for them. This is about whether or not the government should be all powerful, whether or not we should be servants to the whims of tyrants, or invidiual citizens free to live our own lives. This the debate that will determine whether or not we remain masters of our own fate, or if we become a mindless conglomerate subject to the iron fisted rule of an unaccountable body of tyrants. You choose.